Have her look at every graded assignment - she'll correct all your mistakes! At the beginning of the semester I thought that she was boring, but as the semester went on I found that, even though she can be a bit particular at times, she is a very well rounded teacher. I would not recommend taking her if you have issues with punctuation while writing though The class is extremely boring if you dont have to take it i wouldnt.
Had her for , , and World Lit. Best professor I've had! She is tough but super fair, makes an effort to learn everyone's name. Ask her questions and go to her office, she loves it!! Put in the effort and ask for help, you'll be fine. Schmidtt is a very nice lady and her class is laid back and enjoyable. I made a B on all the papers but she begs you to go during her office hours so she can make corrections before turning it in, so i could have made higher if i had done that.
Midterm and final are take home assignments.
Schmitt is absolutely fantastic! My favorite teacher at MGA. She is SO sweet and caring! She will drop whatever she's doing to help a student.
- Girl, Whipped: A Racy Sexy Erotic Spanking Schoolgirl Story by Crissy Lay!
- Navigation menu.
- Party At My Crib, 2 A.M..
- Meditations of a Sufi.
- Talk:Eight-circuit model of consciousness.
- Youth Soccer Drills and Plays Handbook (Youth Drills and Plays- Series 3 Book 5 1).
- Tinkers Creek.
Her class had a relaxed environment, which made learning easy and stress-free. Her essays do demand quality work, but it is easy! At first she might boggle your mind because she talks about all upcoming assignments right at the beginning of the course, but give her a chance.
She's super helpful. Go to her office hours and she will help you SO much with your papers. She's great! If you do the work and put in some effort this is an easy A!
UCC Book of Modules, / Pharmacy
You must do the readings ahead of time and the papers. She will check your papers before you turn them in if you go to her office hours! An A is very easily achievable if you put in the effort. Lectures are easy to listen to. If you participate this will be a fun class.
Ads can be annoying, but they allow us to provide you this resource for free. If you use an ad blocker, we're not getting that revenue that helps keep RateMyProfessors. Help guide your fellow classmates by giving them the inside scoop! They'll do the same for you. Hope you had a good semester. We're all counting on you. The action you're trying to take is only available to logged in users.
- REINCARNATION, CHANNELING AND POSSESSION.
- Easter Egg Hunt On The Farm - A Look and Find Counting Easter Book For Children!
- Solr browse: TCD_All_Micro?
- Uneredità di avorio e ambra (Italian Edition)!
- Download PDF Anal Gets an A: Passing Prof Learys Lit Class?
- Eight-circuit model of consciousness - Wikipedia;
- Break the Chain of Abuse.
- Yield Spread: A Novel.
- Spa Wars: The Ugly Truth about the Beauty Industry downloads @ Adafk的部落格 :: 痞客邦 ::.
- Singapore and The Thailand-Burma Railway.
- Freemason Philosophy For The 21st Century!
Natmanprime talk , 25 November UTC. This is a false claim for origin, yet still holds some relevance.
Get e-book Globalization and Its Managerial Implications
This is the main resource used in this confusion. Leary does show inspiration from the Hindu system, chakras, yoga, and various other sources in the book "Game of Life" on pages 18, 34, and The names of the circuits in this article do not correspond with my recollection from reading Prometheus Rising 8 or 9 years ago. For instance, why doesn't the article apply the terms oral and anal. Yeah, the order is different from prometheus rising. However, Wilson later changed his version back to learys i.
I will probably add the terms anal, oral, and as well as others used in prometheus rising to the article sooner or later. Also, never heard of that lecture. I ought to check it out. Regardless of his difference of the 6th and 7th circuit in "Prometheus Rising" versus "Quantum Psychology", Wilson still uses the same names for the 1st and 2nd circuit in both books. The main problem is that the bulk of the article is just allegedly sourced by a pile of "references" dumped in "Bibliography", with no indication what statements are sourced by what works, further compounded by innumerable editors, most of the anonymous, changing things willy-nilly over several years of now-resolved neutrality turmoil, such that material that once may have been sourced to a specific reference has had numerous interpolations from other usually unknown source, been moved, and otherwise altered without the references being kept up to what little extent they can be kept up with proper footnote citations per WP:CITE , AND other "references" have been added that are not necessarily pertinent, reliable or useful, per WP:RS.
The upshot being that large amounts of this article could simply be legitimately deleted per policy at WP:V , as unsourced, especially given how long they've been tagged and how much debate this article was seeing several years ago. Why is Christopher S. Hyatt mentioned at all? I'm faintly familiar with his work as a skeptic of it and other stuff like it. Patrick's Day and Papua New Guinean peyote ceremonies? I'm having a hard time tracking down any connection at all between the eight-circuit model and Hyatt. Just because Hyatt knew Leary and Wilson at least peripherally, published an interview with Leary, and has been in anthologized publications with both other authors doesn't mean he's connected pro, con or at all to the topic of this article.
I'm therefore tempted to delete his mention, unless someone's got a citation to something. Hyatt has contributed to the model in his book "Undoing Yourself".
I'm going to suggest that this article be chopped up to remove anything that cannot be given a reliable source, and whatever is left over should be turned into a thoroughly NPOV section in either the Tim Leary article, or the Prometheus Rising article. Other than that, I see no reason why this article shouldn't be nominated for deletion, since it has remained in violation of WP:GNG for some time, with no improvement. Both of the sources this article relies most on are primary.
Get e-book Anal Gets an A: Passing Prof Learys Lit Class
Most of the others appear to be part of a personal website. On a personal note, besides violating NPOV in language and content, and its subject's doubtful notability, this article is very sloppy work. Undiskedste talk , 11 June UTC. I have decided to remove the Psychology tag from this talk page because of concerns that the article presents a pseudoscientific formulation as a genuine theory in psychology.
No sources have been cited to indicate that this model has ever been seriously discussed or even mentioned in any reputable psychology journal or textbook, even to discredit it. Therefore, in spite of its pretensions to be a model of consciousness, I don't think this belongs in the psychology category, any more than, say, palmistry does.
Has anyone, anywhere, done a proper scientific investigation or even discussion of this model? This is literally a made-up hypothesis with zero evidence ever, though slight popularity in the pre-New Age Human Potential Movement culture of the s - but the same would apply to astrology, for instance. How does this fit into "transhumanism" per se? Is there evidence of it gaining popularity in the transhumanist subculture as such? This article should not be affiliated with Transhumanism. Although there are many correlations in regards to the evolution of the human species with both Transhumanism and the Eight-circuit model of consciousness, the association can mislead readers on both ends of each subject.
Dpowellb talk , 25 November UTC. Note:This section is a rehash argument from archives Check "Factual Evidence" and "Pseudoscience" from Archive 1 on the talkpage. Earlier consensus has shown the model not to be pseudoscience.
Related Anal Gets an A: Passing Prof Learys Lit Class
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved